FRANKLIN et al v. RANDOLPH COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
| TRACI M FRANKLIN and WILLIAM FRANKLIN |
| RANDOLPH COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, RANDOLPH COUNTY SHERIFF and WINCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| 1:2018cv01340 |
| May 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER - For the reasons described herein, the Court GRANTS the Winchester County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, 51 , in its entirety. In addition, the Court GRANTS IN PART the Randolph County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgm ent, 59 , as to: all false arrest and Monell claims; any negligent supervision/training claims; all claims against Deputy Hammons; the Franklins' state law claims against the Randolph County Commissioners; and Mr. Franklin's loss of consor tium claim against the Randolph County Commissioners. The Court further relinquishes jurisdiction over and REMANDS the remaining state law claims to the Randolph Circuit Court for further proceedings: the Franklins' state law claims against the Randolph County Sheriff Department; and Mr. Franklin's loss of consortium claim against the Randolph County Sheriff Department. Final Judgment shall enter accordingly. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/11/2019. (JDH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
