STOKES v. CLARK et al
JOHN STOKES |
CAPTAIN MICHAEL CLARK and STATE OF INDIANA |
1:2018cv01613 |
May 25, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Tim A. Baker |
William T. Lawrence |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on Defendants' Motion to Enforce Settlement. [Filing No. 91.] He recommends that Defendants motion, [Filing No. 90], be granted and Defendant s be ordered to tender $600 to Mr. Stokes' attorney for distribution to Mr. Stokes consistent with the terms of representation, [Filing No. 91]. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to fi le objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, [Filing No. 91], and Defendants Motion to Enforce Settlement, [F iling No. 90], is GRANTED. Defendants are ORDERED to tender the $600 settlement amount to Stokes' attorney for distribution to Stokes consistent with the terms of the representation. Defendants are ORDERED to file a motion with this Court once the payment has been made. At that time, the Court will dismiss this case with prejudice. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/14/2020.(JDH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.