PRUITT v. KNIGHT et al
| RAYMOND PRUITT |
| ACKUDALE, BONE, BRODAN, CAMPBELL, EDWARDS, ELEN, FANARDY, FULFOND, GOOD, K. HARTZELL, HILL, JONES, KINNAMAN, S. KNIGHT, J. LEWIS, LUMPKIN, MCCOY, MCKINNEY, NEWMAN, C. PENFOLD, ROACH, ROLLANE and SMITH |
| 1:2018cv01658 |
| May 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
Order - Discussing 86 Motion to Compel and 96 Motion to Preserve Evidence. As explained above, the motion to compel, dkt. 86 , is granted in part and denied in part. The defendants shall produce no later than April 30, 2019, any grievances, r equests for interview, or other complaints filed by any inmate at the Plainfield Correctional Facility related to environmental conditions, including allegations regarding the presence of mold, or sanitation within that facility, any investigation of said complaints, and any responses provided regarding those complaints between 2015-2018. Additionally, the defendants shall have through April 15, 2019, in which to file a notice with the Court describing what efforts they made to identify an d preserve video evidence of the incidents described in Mr. Pruitt's discovery request, when they first made those efforts, and how they concluded that no video of the incident exists. The motion to preserve evidence, dkt. 96 , is granted consistent with this ruling. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/29/2019. (NAD)
|
|
Filing
8
ENTRY SCREENING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - Pruitt's claim that he has been exposed to black mold shall proceed against all Defendants. All other claims have been dismissed. If Pruitt believes that additional claims were a lleged in his Complaint, but not identified by the Court, he shall have through July 5, 2018, in which to identify those claims. The Clerk is directed, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3), to issue process to the Defendants in the m anner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the Complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/13/2018.(NAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
