DILLON v. CUTRER et al
Dawn Dillon |
DHS Express and Buford Cutrer |
1:2018cv02035 |
July 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Tim A Baker |
William T Lawrence |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Buford Cutrer, DHS Express. (Whitten, Christopher) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendants Buford Cutrer, DHS Express. (Whitten, Christopher) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher R. Whitten on behalf of Defendants Buford Cutrer, DHS Express. (Whitten, Christopher) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by R. Gregory Sylvester on behalf of Defendants Buford Cutrer, DHS Express. (Sylvester, R.) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET , filed by Defendants Buford Cutrer, DHS Express. (Whitten, Christopher) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court 7, case number 49D07-1805-CT-018071, filed by DHS Express, Buford Cutrer. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-4953785) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's First Request for Admission, #2 State Court Record (Complaint for Damages, Summons to DHS Express, Summons to Buford Cutrer, Appearance by Attorneys Christopher R. Whitten and R. Gregory Sylvester, Motion for Enlargement of Time and Order Granting Enlargement of Time))(Whitten, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.