GANAWAY v. SHANNON-HARDEN et al
| MAXINE K. GANAWAY |
| WENDY LORRAINE SHANNON-HARDEN |
| METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| CALVIN SHANNON, NADRA R. OWENS, ESTATE OF JAMES WATSON C/O WENDY LORRAINE SHANNON-HARDEN, BARBARA J. BLACK and MARY A. HILL |
| 1:2018cv02037 |
| July 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Bengs, Tina) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY identifying Corporate Parent MetLife Inc for METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.. (Bengs, Tina) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Tina M. Bengs on behalf of Defendant METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Bengs, Tina) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Circuit Court, case number 49D01-01805-CT-018582, filed by METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-4953988) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B, Notice of Filing Notice of Removal to be filed in state court action, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bengs, Tina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
