POWERS v. FINANCIAL CREDIT SERVICE, INC., d/b/a ARA
ELISABETH POWERS |
FINANCIAL CREDIT SERVICE, INC., d/b/a ARA and FINANCIAL CREDIT SERVICE, INC |
1:2018cv02123 |
July 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Matthew P Brookman |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven James Halbert on behalf of Plaintiff ELISABETH POWERS. (Halbert, Steven) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Carissa Rasch on behalf of Plaintiff ELISABETH POWERS. (Rasch, Carissa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Angie K. Robertson on behalf of Plaintiff ELISABETH POWERS. (Robertson, Angie) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary E. Philipps on behalf of Plaintiff ELISABETH POWERS. (Philipps, Mary) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David J. Philipps on behalf of Plaintiff ELISABETH POWERS. (Philipps, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FINANCIAL CREDIT SERVICE, INC., d/b/a ARA, filed by ELISABETH POWERS. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-4967157) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Indiana Secretary of State Corporate Information, #2 Exhibit B - NMLS State License Information, #3 Exhibit C - Collection Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons)(Philipps, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.