ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS, INC. v. CARTER
| ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS, INC., a California corporation and ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS, INC. |
| Dr. David Carter and DAVID CARTER |
| 1:2018cv02209 |
| July 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson revised May 2018. (APD) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to DAVID CARTER. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS, INC., a California corporation. (Paige, Pamela) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Pamela A. Paige on behalf of Plaintiff ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS, INC., a California corporation. (Paige, Pamela) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dr. David Carter, filed by ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS, INC., a California corporation. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-4976703) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A - Exclusive Laboratory Services Agreement, #4 Exhibit B - Amendment to Agreement, #5 Exhibit C - Letter Notice of Past Due Balance)(Paige, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
