KINNICK v. DMSD MANAGEMENT, LLC.
| RICHARD KINNICK |
| JACK IN THE BOX, INC. and DMSD MANAGEMENT, LLC |
| 1:2018cv02284 |
| July 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Richard L Young |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Removal Notice in the Marion County Superior Court by JACK IN THE BOX, INC. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Clerk-Plaintiff - state court) (Bruno, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JACK IN THE BOX, INC. identifying Other Affiliate BLACKROCK, INC. for JACK IN THE BOX, INC... (Bruno, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew D. Bruno on behalf of Defendant JACK IN THE BOX, INC.. (Bruno, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion County Civil Court 13, case number 49D13-1805-CT-020742, filed by JACK IN THE BOX, INC.. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-4988276) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Appearance, Complaint for Damages, Summons, Certificate of Issuance of Summons (premises), Certificate of Issuance of Summons (headquarters), Appearance, Notice of Automatic Initial Enlargement of Time, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bruno, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.