DOUGHTY v. OPTIO SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
| TEANA DOUGHTY |
| CREDIT CONTROL, LLC, OPTIO SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a QUALIA COLLECTION SERVICES and OPTIO SOLUTIONS, LLC |
| 1:2018cv02292 |
| July 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Carissa Rasch on behalf of Plaintiff TEANA DOUGHTY. (Rasch, Carissa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Angie K. Robertson on behalf of Plaintiff TEANA DOUGHTY. (Robertson, Angie) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary E. Philipps on behalf of Plaintiff TEANA DOUGHTY. (Philipps, Mary) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David J. Philipps on behalf of Plaintiff TEANA DOUGHTY. (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CREDIT CONTROL, LLC, OPTIO SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a QUALIA COLLECTION SERVICES, filed by TEANA DOUGHTY. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-4989172) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Group A - Indiana Secretary of State Corporate Information, #2 Exhibit Group B - Indiana Licensure Information, #3 Exhibit C - Collection Letter, #4 Exhibit D - Collection Letter, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Philipps, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
