BRIGGS v. HUNTER WARFIELD, INC.
Plaintiff: CLINTON BRIGGS
Defendant: HUNTER WARFIELD, INC.
Case Number: 1:2018cv02463
Filed: August 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - Pursuant to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by the Plaintiff in this cause, this cause is hereby dismissed with prejudice, and each party shall bear its own respective costs and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, incurred in connection with this cause #8 . Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/2/2018.(APD)
October 1, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss with prejudice, filed by Plaintiff CLINTON BRIGGS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order of Dismissal)(Steinkamp, John)
September 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Directing Filing of Documents Authorizing Dismissal: The court has been notified that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case. Therefore, all pending motions, if any, are now DENIED AS MOOT and all previously ordered dates relating to discovery, filings, schedules, conferences, and trial, if any, are VACATED. Within thirty days of the date of this entry, counsel for the plaintiff shall file a motion to dismiss this cause and submit an order for the court's signature ordering the dismissal of this action or a stipulation of dismissal (consistent with the agreement of the parties). Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 9/12/2018.(SWM)
August 24, 2018 Filing 6 RETURN of Service, filed by CLINTON BRIGGS. HUNTER WARFIELD, INC. served on 8/15/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Service)(Steinkamp, John)
August 14, 2018 Filing 5 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (APD)
August 13, 2018 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
August 13, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to HUNTER WARFIELD, INC. (REO)
August 10, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Thomas Steinkamp on behalf of Plaintiff CLINTON BRIGGS. (Steinkamp, John)
August 10, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against HUNTER WARFIELD, INC., filed by CLINTON BRIGGS. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5011073) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Debt Collector License Information, #2 Exhibit 2 - The May 8, 2018, letter sent by Plaintiff's Counsel, #3 Exhibit 3 - Plaintiff's Affidavit, #4 Exhibit A - Relevant pages of Plaintiff's July 13, 2018 TransUnion credit report, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Steinkamp, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRIGGS v. HUNTER WARFIELD, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CLINTON BRIGGS
Represented By: John Thomas Steinkamp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HUNTER WARFIELD, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?