CISLO v. TALBOT et al
| RONNIE B. CISLO |
| INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DUSHANE ZATECKY, PAUL TALBOT and WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES |
| 1:2018cv02511 |
| August 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES c/o Joe Ebbits waiver sent on 9/25/2018. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by PAUL TALBOT. PAUL TALBOT waiver sent on 9/25/2018. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk as to Dr. Talbot and WExford Health Services (JRB) |
| Filing 9 Screening Standard - The clerk is instructed to update the docket to show that the only defendants proceeding in this action are Wexford Health Sources and Dr. Talbot. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to Dr. Talbot and Wexford Health Sources in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, dkt. 2, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. The motion requesting service of process, dkt. #5 , is denied as unnecessary. Copy sent to parties via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/25/2018. (JRB) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Scope of Class, filed by Plaintiff RONNIE B. CISLO (Sniderman, Mark) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Counsel for the plaintiffs in Stafford vs Robert Carter 1:17-cv-289-JMS-MJD is directed to notify this court no later than September 21, 2018, whether the plaintiff is part of this class. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 8/31/2018 (dist made) (CBU)
|
| Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 5 MOTION Requesting Service of Process by the United States Marshal Service, filed by Plaintiff RONNIE B. CISLO. (REO) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Ronnie B. Cislo re #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by RONNIE B. CISLO. (REO) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RONNIE B. CISLO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Offender Trust Statement)(REO) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PAUL TALBOT, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, DUSHANE ZATECKY, filed by RONNIE B. CISLO. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Health care documents)(REO) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by RONNIE B. CISLO located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by RONNIE B. CISLO to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
