ELLISON et al v. FIRST MERCHANTS BANK
R Anthony Ellison, Amy Phelps, R. ANTHONY ELLISON and AMY ELLISON PHELPS |
FIRST MERCHANTS BANK |
1:2018cv02678 |
August 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
William T Lawrence |
Doris L Pryor |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Rodney S Retzner on behalf of Defendant FIRST MERCHANTS BANK. (Retzner, Rodney) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Stuart Morrisson on behalf of Defendant FIRST MERCHANTS BANK. (Morrisson, Scott) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua D. Hague on behalf of Defendant FIRST MERCHANTS BANK. (Hague, Joshua) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by R. ANTHONY ELLISON, AMY ELLISON PHELPS. FIRST MERCHANTS BANK waiver sent on 8/31/2018. (Caughey, Ben) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET , filed by Plaintiffs R ANTHONY ELLISON, AMY PHELPS. (Caughey, Ben) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (MEH) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ben T. Caughey on behalf of Plaintiffs R Anthony Ellison, Amy Phelps. (Caughey, Ben) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FIRST MERCHANTS BANK, filed by R Anthony Ellison, Amy Phelps. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5038113) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Richard E. Ellison Will)(Caughey, Ben) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.