MARKETING SERVICES OF INDIANA, INC. v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
MARKETING SERVICES OF INDIANA, INC. |
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., PURDUE PHARMA L.P., MCKESSON CORPORATION, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, CARDINAL HEALTH, INC., PURDUE PHARMA, INC., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ACTAVIS, INC., INSYS THERAPEUTICS, INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., ACTAVIS PLC and CEPHALON, INC. |
1:2018cv02778 |
September 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Richard L Young |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Remark - The Southern District of Indiana receives email notice from the Clerk of the Northern District of Ohio in regarding electronic case transfer. This case was received electronically by the Northern District of Ohio on 9/27/2018 and was assigned case number 1:18-op-46104 in the receiving court. (MAC) |
Filing 11 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Northern District of Ohio. Case transferred electronically to Northern District of Ohio, IN RE: MDL 2804 on September 27, 2018. (MAC) |
Filing 10 CLOSED TRANSFER to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION MDL No. 2804 Per Certified Transfer Order (CTO-56). Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/27/2018. (MAC) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #8 Motion for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically. The Clerk of this Court is to issue a refund to counsel for Plaintiff in the amount of $400.00 for payment in duplicate of the filing fees associated with this cause of action. Copy to Finance Department. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 9/24/2018. (SWM) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically , filed by Plaintiff MARKETING SERVICES OF INDIANA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Clark, Christopher) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MARKETING SERVICES OF INDIANA, INC.. (Clark, Christopher) |
Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to ACTAVIS PLC, ACTAVIS, INC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION, CARDINAL HEALTH, INC., CEPHALON, INC., ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., INSYS THERAPEUTICS, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, MCKESSON CORPORATION, PURDUE PHARMA L.P., PURDUE PHARMA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.. (JRB) |
Filing 4 ***PLEASE DISERGARD. CORRECTED BY #5 *** Summons Issued as to MARKETING SERVICES OF INDIANA, INC. (JRB) Modified on 9/10/2018 (JRB). |
Filing 3 NOTICE to File Corporate Disclosure Statement to MARKETING SERVICES OF INDIANA, INC.. (LAB) (JRB) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher E. Clark on behalf of Plaintiff MARKETING SERVICES OF INDIANA, INC.. (Clark, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5054570) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Clark, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.