HUNTER v. WARDEN
| STEVEN HUNTER |
| WARDEN |
| 1:2018cv02873 |
| September 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Richard L Young |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to 11/19/18. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 11/6/2018. (JRB)
|
| Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to November 19, 2018 in which to #5 Order to Show Cause (Disciplinary) , filed by Respondent WARDEN. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Weiss, Natalie) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Natalie Faye Weiss on behalf of Respondent WARDEN. (Weiss, Natalie) |
| Filing 6 RECEIPT #IP062414 for filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (DJH) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary) - Steven Hunter's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction in disciplinary case number IYC 18-05-0042 on May 10, 2018. The petitioner shall have through October 22, 2018, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 11/5/2018. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/24/2018.(JRB)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 Brief re #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by STEVEN HUNTER. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by STEVEN HUNTER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Disciplinary Hearing Appeal, Report of Conduct, Report of Disciplinary Hearing, Notice of Disciplinary Hearing, Notice to Lay Advocate/Witness)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by STEVEN HUNTER located at PLAINFIELD CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by STEVEN HUNTER to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HUNTER v. WARDEN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN | |
| Represented By: | Natalie Faye Weiss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: STEVEN HUNTER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
