CISLO v. ZATECKY et al
| RONNIE BEE CISLO |
| MICHAEL VANDINE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DUSHAN ZATECKY |
| 1:2018cv02979 |
| September 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Reassignment of Case to Judge James Patrick Hanlon. Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number ( 1:18-cv-2979-JPH-DML), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (JDad) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Paul Nagy on behalf of Defendants MICHAEL VANDINE, DUSHAN ZATECKY. (Nagy, Jonathan) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by DUSHAN ZATECKY. DUSHAN ZATECKY waiver sent on 10/2/2018. (Esenwein, Jill) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by MICHAEL VANDINE. MICHAEL VANDINE waiver sent on 10/2/2018. (Esenwein, Jill) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jill Esenwein on behalf of Defendants MICHAEL VANDINE, DUSHAN ZATECKY. (Esenwein, Jill) |
| Filing 9 DECLARATION of Non-Party Shane Cates by RONNIE BEE CISLO. (APD) |
| Filing 8 DECLARATION of Non-Party Michael Stafford by RONNIE BEE CISLO. (APD) |
| Filing 7 Documents for Service by IDOC - re #2 Complaint, #6 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk, #5 Entry. (APD) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk (APD) |
| Filing 5 Entry Granting Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Screening Complaint, Dismissing Insufficient Claim, and Directing Service of Process - The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying fees or costs, dkt #3 , is granted because the Court finds that the plaintiff does not have the assets or means to pay even an initial partial filing fee. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to Michael Vandine and Dushan Zatecky in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). The clerk is instructed to update the docket to show that the IDOC has been dismissed as a defendant from this action. (See Entry). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/2/2018.(APD) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff, RONNIE BEE CISLO. (Attachments: #1 Transaction History)(DJH) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHAEL VANDINE, DUSHAN ZATECKY, filed by RONNIE BEE CISLO. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Request for Interview, #2 Proposed Summons)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by RONNIE BEE CISLO located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by RONNIE BEE CISLO to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
