TAYLOR v. WARDEN
| EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR |
| WARDEN |
| 1:2018cv03050 |
| October 3, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Reassignment of Case to Judge James Patrick Hanlon. Judge Sarah Evans Barker is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number ( 1:18-cv-3050-JPH-TAB), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (JDad) |
| Filing 8 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Respondent WARDEN. (Craft, Aaron) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Respondent WARDEN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Rehearing Letter, #2 Exhibit B - Hearing Report, #3 Exhibit C - OIS Conduct Detail, #4 Exhibit D - Post-Vacatur OIS Sheets, #5 Exhibit E - Pre-Vacatur OIS Sheets)(Craft, Aaron) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron T. Craft on behalf of Respondent WARDEN. (Craft, Aaron) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary). The petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is granted. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted.( Show Cause Response due by 11/23/2018.) Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/11/2018.(SWM)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR. (REO) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR. (No fee paid with this filing) (REO) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TAYLOR v. WARDEN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN | |
| Represented By: | Aaron T. Craft |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
