REGENCY CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC v. COJONES CAPITAL INC.
| REGENCY CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC and REGENCY CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC |
| COJONES CAPITAL INC and COJONES CAPITAL INC. |
| 1:2018cv03204 |
| October 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JDH) |
| Filing 14 Summons Issued as to COJONES CAPITAL INC. (LAB) (JDH) |
| Filing 13 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to COJONES CAPITAL INC.. (Coleman, Gregory) |
| Filing 12 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by REGENCY CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC. COJONES CAPITAL INC. served on 10/30/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Coleman, Gregory) |
| Filing 11 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by REGENCY CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC. COJONES CAPITAL INC. served on 10/29/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Coleman, Gregory) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against COJONES CAPITAL INC., filed by REGENCY CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC.(Coleman, Gregory) |
Filing 9
ORDER - Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint, pursuant to the Court's Order dated October 17, 2018, alleging that the Court has diversity jurisdiction over this matter. For the reasons stated in this Order, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint on or before November 9, 2018, which properly alleges a basis for the Court's diversity jurisdiction. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/26/2018.(APD)
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against COJONES CAPITAL INC., filed by REGENCY CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Coleman, Gregory) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER - Plaintiff, an LLC, has filed a Complaint in which it alleges that this Court has diversity jurisdiction over this matter. Because "the citizenship of unincorporated associations must be traced through however many layers of partners or members there may be," Plaintiff must allege both the "identity and citizenship" of each of its members. Plaintiff's Complaint fails to allege either the identity or citizenship of its members, and thus fails to establish the complete diversity of the parties. Therefore, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint on or before October 26, 2018 which properly alleges a basis for this Court's diversity jurisdiction. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/17/2018.(APD)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, Gregory H. Coleman hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. (Coleman, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 Submission of Signature Requirement re #1 Complaint by REGENCY CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC. (Coleman, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 3 Submission Exhibit A Unsecured Promissory Note TO #1 COMPLAINT, filed by Plaintiff REGENCY CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC. (Coleman, Gregory) Modified on 10/15/2018 (REO). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory H. Coleman on behalf of Plaintiff REGENCY CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC. (Coleman, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COJONES CAPITAL INC, filed by REGENCY CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5109655) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Coleman, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
