HOLMES v. KILPATRICK
| ERIC DONNELL HOLMES |
| COLLIN KILPATRICK |
| 1:2018cv03238 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ENTRY - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #6 , is granted. The plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Two Dollars and Twelve Cents ($2.12). He shall have through December 15, 2018, to pay this sum to the clerk. The Court did not misapprehend the plaintiff's claims, nor did it misapply the law to those claims in finding that dismissal was required. Accordingly, the motion to reconsider, dkt. #5 , treated as a motion to alter or amend judgment, is denied. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 11/28/2018. Copy Mailed. (CKM) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by ERIC DONNELL HOLMES. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CKM) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ERIC DONNELL HOLMES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Inmate Trust Account) (CKM) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/14/2018: #2 Envelope) (CKM). |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration re #4 Closed Dismissed, filed by Plaintiff ERIC DONNELL HOLMES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Various Documents, #2 Envelope)(CKM) |
| Filing 4 FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PRO. 58 -The Court having this day made its Entry directing the entry of final judgment, now enters FINAL JUDGMENT and this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/24/2018. Copy Mailed.(CKM) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY - Directing the Plaintiff to Pay the Filing Fee, Dismissing Complaint, and Directing Entry of Final Judgment; The plaintiff shall have through November 26, 2018, in which to either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that he lacks the financial ability to do so.The allegations in the complaint are so fanciful that they fail to engage the Court's subject matter jurisdiction, dismissal of this action shall should be without prejudice. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now be issued. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/24/2018. Copy Mailed. (CKM) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COLLIN KILPATRICK, filed by ERIC DONNELL HOLMES. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(HET) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HOLMES v. KILPATRICK | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ERIC DONNELL HOLMES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COLLIN KILPATRICK | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
