BULLOCK v. SAVAGE
| BRODERICK V. BULLOCK, SR. |
| D. FENDER, MARION CTY JAIL 1, WEXFORD and SAVAGE |
| 1:2018cv03248 |
| October 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Submission of Response to Court Entry #13 , filed by Plaintiff BRODERICK V. BULLOCK, SR. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(JDH) |
| Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by BRODERICK V. BULLOCK, SR. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(JDH) |
| Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by BRODERICK V. BULLOCK, SR. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(JDH) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk. (LAB) (JDH) |
| Filing 13 Entry Screening Amended Complaints, Dismissing Certain Claims, and Directing Service of Process - In this Entry, the Court has screened the amended complaint, dismissed claims asserted against M.C.J. 1 Medical Doctor and Sheriff John Layton, disregarded the second amended complaint, allowed a failure to protect claim to proceed against Ms. Savage, and directed the clerk to issue service. The clerk is directed to terminate D. Fender, Marion Cty Jail 1, and Wexford as defendants and name Ms. Savage as the sole defendant in this action. (See Entry). Copy to Defendant via US mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/5/2018.(JDH) |
| Filing 12 ENTRY - The plaintiff's motions to proceed in forma pauperis, dkts. #9 & #11 , are denied as moot because the plaintiff was granted in forma pauperis status with no initial partial filing fee on November 5, 2018. Dkt. #6 . Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/3/2018. (JDH) |
| Filing 11 SECOND MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - renewed, filed by Plaintiff BRODERICK V. BULLOCK, SR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Prisoner account information)(JDH) |
| Filing 10 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by BRODERICK V. BULLOCK, SR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - medical information, notes, requests for interview)(JDH) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - renewed, filed by Plaintiff BRODERICK V. BULLOCK, SR. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner account information)(JDH) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by BRODERICK V. BULLOCK, SR.(JDH) |
| Filing 7 Entry Dismissing Complaint and Directing Filing of Amended Complaint - The plaintiff is a prisoner currently incarcerated at Miami Correctional Facility ("Miami"). Because the plaintiff is a "prisoner" as defined by 28 U.S.C. 1915 (h), this Court has an obligation under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b) to screen his complaint before service on the defendants. First, all claims against Warden D. Fender are dismissed because the complaint contains no factual allegations against D. Fender. Second, all claims against Marion County Jail 1 are dismissed because the jail is not a "person" subject to suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Third, all claims against Wexford are dismissed. Because the Court has been unable to identify a viable claim for relief against any particular defendant, the complaint is subject to dismissal. The dismissal of the complaint will not in this instance lead to the dismissal of the action at present. Instead, the plaintiff shall have through December 17, 2018, in which to file an amended complaint. The clerk is directed to include a copy of the civil rights complaint form with the plaintiff's copy of this Entry. (SEE ENTRY). Copy of Entry and applicable form via prisoner e-service as attachment to this Entry. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/19/2018. (Attachments: #1 Form Complaint)(APD) |
Filing 6
ORDER on In Forma Pauperis Status:The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. [ #5 ], is granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing ruling, "[a]ll [28 U.S.C.] 1915 has ever done is excuse pre-payment of the docket fees; a litigant remains liable for them, and for other costs, although poverty may make collection impossible." Abdul-Wadood v. Nathan, 91 F.3d 1023, 1025 (7th Cir. 1996). The assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is waived because the plaintiff has no assets and no means by which to pay a partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(4). Accordingly, no initial partial filing fee is due at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 11/5/2018. (SWM)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff BRODERICK V. BULLOCK, SR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Cover Letter)(APD) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff shall have through November 26, 2018, in which to either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that he lacks the financial ability to do so. If he seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis, his request must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action on October 19, 2018. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/26/2018.(APD) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against D. FENDER, MARION CTY JAIL 1, WEXFORD, filed by BRODERICK V. BULLOCK, SR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit - Social Security documents, #3 Exhibit - tort claim documents)(REO) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by BRODERICK V. BULLOCK, SR located at MIAMI CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by BRODERICK V. BULLOCK, SR to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO) Modified on 10/22/2018 (REO). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
