HAWORTH v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
EMILY HAWORTH |
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICE, LLC. and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC |
1:2018cv03268 |
October 23, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Reassignment of Case to Judge James Patrick Hanlon. Judge Tanya Walton Pratt is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number ( 1:18-cv-3268-JPH-DML), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (NRad) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (HET) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by David W. Hemminger on behalf of Plaintiff EMILY HAWORTH. (Hemminger, David) |
Filing 3 Submission of Signature Requirement re #1 Complaint by EMILY HAWORTH. (Hemminger, David) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Verified against EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICE, LLC., filed by EMILY HAWORTH. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5122053) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons to Equifax)(Hemminger, David) Modified on 10/24/2018 (HET). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.