RYAN v. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: MISTY RYAN
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Case Number: 1:2018cv03277
Filed: October 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2018 Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT of Administrative Record of Social Security Administration, by NANCY A. BERRYHILL. (Attachments: #1 court transcript index, #2 administrative documents part 1, #3 administrative documents part 2, #4 administrative documents part 3, #5 administrative documents part 4, #6 administrative documents part 5, #7 payment documents, #8 jurisdictional documents part 1, #9 jurisdictional documents part 2, #10 non disability related documents, #11 disability related documents, #12 medical records part 1, #13 medical records part 2, #14 medical records part 3, #15 medical records part 4, #16 medical records part 5, #17 medical records part 6, #18 medical records part 7)(Wierenga, Julian)
November 9, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant NANCY A. BERRYHILL. (Wierenga, Julian)
October 26, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant NANCY A. BERRYHILL. (Wierenga, Julian)
October 25, 2018 Filing 5 ENTRY - granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/25/2018. (NAD)
October 25, 2018 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET)
October 25, 2018 (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) CLERK'S NOTICE - Pursuant to Local Rule 5-12(a), and by agreement with the United States Attorney, no actual service of initial process is required in Social Security appeals brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, unless otherwise ordered. The Social Security Administration will treat notification through the Court's Case Management and Electronic Filing System (CM/ECF) as service under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the Clerk's Office will refrain from issuance of the submitted summons(es) unless otherwise ordered. (TEXT-ENTRY: There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) (HET)
October 24, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff MISTY RYAN. (Redelman, Jonelle)
October 24, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonelle L. Redelman on behalf of Plaintiff MISTY RYAN. (Redelman, Jonelle)
October 24, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL, filed by MISTY RYAN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Redelman, Jonelle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RYAN v. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Represented By: Julian Clifford Wierenga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MISTY RYAN
Represented By: Jonelle L. Redelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?