COOK v. STERIS, PLC
| LEAH COOK |
| STERIS, PLC |
| 1:2018cv03545 |
| November 14, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC INITIAL EXTENSION, filed by Defendant STERIS, PLC (Masur, James) |
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 2/19/2019 02:30 PM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. Parties shall participate in this conference by counsel. The information needed by counsel of record to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by separate notification. If a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") has not yet been filed, the parties are ordered to confer prior to the initial pretrial conference and prepare a proposed CMP. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 12/6/2018.(SWM)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by James D. Masur, II on behalf of Defendant STERIS, PLC. (Masur, James) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 1:18-cv-3545-JMS-TAB, on all future filings in this matter. (HET) |
Filing 5
ORDER - In the interest of speedy administration of justice, to ensure appropriate oversight, and pursuant to Local Rule 40-1(f), the Clerk IS HEREBY ORDERED to reassign this matter to Magistrate Judge Baker. The parties should use the above cause number in all future filings in this matter. All case schedules and deadlines before the District Judge and Magistrate Judge remain unchanged at this time, including hearing, conference, and trial dates. In the event that any calendared dates must be vacated and reassigned, the parties will receive notice by separate order. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/15/2018.(APD)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to STERIS, PLC. (HET) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jay Meisenhelder on behalf of Plaintiff LEAH COOK. (Meisenhelder, Jay) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against STERIS, PLC, filed by LEAH COOK. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5155725) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons : STERIS, PLC)(Meisenhelder, Jay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: COOK v. STERIS, PLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LEAH COOK | |
| Represented By: | Jay Meisenhelder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: STERIS, PLC | |
| Represented By: | James D. Masur, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.