KURITZ v. ALLEGION et al
| CHERYL KURITZ |
| PATRICK MCCARTHY and ALLEGION |
| 1:2018cv03583 |
| November 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 623 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Attorney(s) Donald G. Slezak to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5232087), filed by Defendants ALLEGION, PATRICK MCCARTHY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Slezak, Donald) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Attorney(s) David A. Campbell to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5232011), filed by Defendants ALLEGION, PATRICK MCCARTHY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Campbell, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Request for Waiver of Service for Summons Supplied by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Sture, Tae) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ALLEGION, PATRICK MCCARTHY. (REO) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Tae K. Sture on behalf of Plaintiff CHERYL KURITZ. (REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALLEGION, PATRICK MCCARTHY, filed by CHERYL KURITZ. (Filing fee $400, receipt number IP062877) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
