UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $50,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY (Asset Identification No.: 17-CBP-000241) et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| $50,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY (Asset Identification No.: 17-CBP-000241) and $50,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY (Asset Identification No.: 17-CBP-000301) |
| 1:2018cv03788 |
| December 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER FOR WARRANT for Arrest of Property. WHEREAS a Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem has been filed in this Court on the 3rd day of December, 2018, by Josh J. Minkler, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, against Fifty thousand dollars in United States Currency ("$50,000.00") and Fifty thousand dollars in United States Currency ("$50,000.00"), defendants herein, for reasons and causes set forth in the Complaint; YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to take custody of and to deliver the defendant funds into the possession of the United States of America, to be detained in the possession of the United States or its designee until further order of this Court, and you will make return thereon not later than ten (10) days after execution of process. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/4/2018. Paper copies to USM.(JDH)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Parker Babbs on behalf of Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Babbs, Eric) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT OF FORFEITURE IN REM against $50,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY (Asset Identification No.: 17-CBP-000241), $50,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY (Asset Identification No.: 17-CBP-000301), filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Warrant for Arrest of Property)(Babbs, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $50,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY (Asset Identification No.: 17-CBP-000241) et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: $50,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY (Asset Identification No.: 17-CBP-000241) | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: $50,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY (Asset Identification No.: 17-CBP-000301) | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Eric Parker Babbs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
