HUTNICK v. EXPRESS RIDE INC. et al
| JUSTIN HUTNICK |
| EXPRESS RIDE INC. and JODEE MAY |
| 1:2018cv03801 |
| December 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to EXPRESS RIDE INC., JODEE MAY. (CKM) |
Filing 5
ORDER - granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; The clerk shall endorse and return the summonses tendered by Plaintiff to Counsel for Plaintiff. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for serving process on Defendant unless a further specific request is made that court officers effect service of process. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 12/17/2018. (CKM)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff JUSTIN HUTNICK. (Wolcott, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher S. Wolcott on behalf of Plaintiff JUSTIN HUTNICK. (Wolcott, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by JUSTIN HUTNICK. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Express Ride Inc., #3 Proposed Summons Jodee May)(Wolcott, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
