NIBARGER v. ZATECKY
Petitioner: JASON NIBARGER
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Case Number: 1:2019cv00128
Filed: January 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Referring Judge: Doris L Pryor
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2019 Filing 8 CLOSED JUDGMENT-The action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/28/2019.(CBU)
January 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER dismissing petition of writ of habeas corpus and directing entry of final judgment. The Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #6 is granted. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/28/2019.(CBU)
January 24, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner JASON NIBARGER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Transaction History Inquiry and Official Certificate of Prisoner Account)(NAD)
January 24, 2019 Filing 5 RESPONSE, re #4 Order to Show Cause, filed by Petitioner JASON NIBARGER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Request Slip, Offender Location, and Classification Report)(NAD)
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO SHOW CAUSE - Jason Nibarger's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction in STP 18-06-0093. The petitioner shall have through February 15, 2019, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. Because the petition does not allege that any grievous sanctions were imposed that would entitle Nibarger to relief, the petitioner shall have through February 19, 2019, to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for the above reasons. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this action with no further notice to Nibarger. Show Cause Response due by 2/19/2019. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/16/2019.(NAD)
January 14, 2019 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
January 14, 2019 Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JASON NIBARGER. (No fee paid with this filing) (REO)
January 14, 2019 Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by JASON NIBARGER located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by JASON NIBARGER to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NIBARGER v. ZATECKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JASON NIBARGER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?