ALATORRE v. PICO DGALLO, INC.
IVAN ALATORRE |
PICO DGALLO, INC. and PICO D'GALLO, INC. |
1:2019cv00171 |
January 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Mark J Dinsmore |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Plaintiff IVAN ALATORRE . (Adams, Samuel) |
|
|
|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant PICO D'GALLO, INC.. (Groth, William) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by PICO D'GALLO, INC.. (Groth, William) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by William R. Groth on behalf of Defendant PICO D'GALLO, INC.. (Groth, William) |
Filing 6 RETURN of Service, filed by IVAN ALATORRE. PICO D'GALLO, INC. served on 1/29/2019. (Haskin, John) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to PICO D'GALLO, INC.. (HET) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel Mark Adams on behalf of Plaintiff IVAN ALATORRE. (Adams, Samuel) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John H. Haskin on behalf of Plaintiff IVAN ALATORRE. (Haskin, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PICO DGALLO, INC., filed by IVAN ALATORRE. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5240407) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Haskin, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.