MARTIN v. PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
| JAMES MARTIN |
| PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. |
| 1:2019cv00222 |
| January 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLOSED DISMISSED-Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice is Acknowledged (marginal). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/21/2019 (dist made)(CBU) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice by JAMES MARTIN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CKM) |
Filing 9
ORDER - Now before the Court are motions by Plaintiff pro se asking the Court to recruit counsel and enter a permanent injunction. Plaintiff's motion to recruit counsel, Dkt. #7 , is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for a permanent injunction, Dkt. #8 , is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/12/2019. *** SEE ORDER *** Copy Mailed. (CKM)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Permanent Injunction, filed by Plaintiff JAMES MARTIN.c/s (Attachments: #1 Order, #2 Envelope for Order, #3 Envelope) (CKM) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff JAMES MARTIN. c/s (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CKM) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk. (CKM) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; When a plaintiff is allowed to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court must order service of process on the defendant. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to serve Defendant PNC Financial Services Group under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint and its attachments, Dkt. 1; Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, AO 398; Waiver of the Service of Summons, AO 399; and this order. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/29/2019. Copies Mailed (CKM)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Plaintiff JAMES MARTIN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (HET) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JAMES MARTIN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(HET) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., filed by JAMES MARTIN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(HET) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MARTIN v. PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JAMES MARTIN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
