ABNEY v. ROGERS et al
KEITH D. ABNEY |
ROBIN BUYERS, STEVE ROGERS, BILL MENGES and HOWARD COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER |
1:2019cv00271 |
January 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Richard L Young |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 FINAL ORDER TO RESOLVE FILING FEE - Mr. Abney shall have through April 8, 2019, to either pay the filing fee. The clerk is directed to include a copy of #4 with Mr. Abney's copy of this Order. SEE ENTRY. COPY SENT TO PLAINTIFF VIA US MAIL. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/6/2019. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(JRB) |
Filing 4 ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff shall have through February 28, 2019, in which to either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that he lacks the financial ability to do so. SEE ENTRY. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/5/2019.(JRB) |
Filing 3 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge, filed by KEITH D. ABNEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SWM) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROBIN BUYERS, HOWARD COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER, BILL MENGES, STEVE ROGERS, filed by KEITH D. ABNEY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.