DAVIS v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
| RICCI DAVIS |
| WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and BRUCE IPPEL |
| 1:2019cv00371 |
| January 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - Initial Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 4/22/2019 at 11:30 AM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 3/20/2019.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 14
Order on Defendants' #9 Motion for an Enlargement of Time - Defendants filed their "motion for an enlargement of time" on February 19, 2019, both seeking and noticing a twenty-eight-day extension of time to file a responsive pleading pursuant to Southern District of Indiana Local Rule 6-1(b). The filing notes that opposing counsel have no objection to the extension. Pursuant to Rule 6-1(b), a twenty-eight-day extension to file a responsive pleading is automatic under these circumstances. Accordingly, defendants' responsive pleading will be timely if filed within that time frame. No motion is necessary. The clerk is directed to terminate as a motion docket filing #9 . Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/12/2019. (NAD)
|
| Filing 13 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendants BRUCE IPPEL, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC. (Bitner, Douglass) |
| Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendants BRUCE IPPEL, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bitner, Douglass) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC identifying Corporate Parent THE BANTRY GROUP for WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC.. (Bitner, Douglass) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses, filed by BRUCE IPPEL, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC.(Bitner, Douglass) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to March 22, 2019 to Complete and File Responsive Pleading, filed by Defendants BRUCE IPPEL, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bitner, Douglass) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Douglass R. Bitner on behalf of Defendants BRUCE IPPEL, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC. (Bitner, Douglass) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service, filed by RICCI DAVIS. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC served on 2/1/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Service)(Wegg, Jessica) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service, filed by RICCI DAVIS. BRUCE IPPEL served on 2/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Wegg, Jessica) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to BRUCE IPPEL, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC. (REO) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Charles Little on behalf of Plaintiff RICCI DAVIS. (Little, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jessica A. Wegg on behalf of Plaintiff RICCI DAVIS. (Wegg, Jessica) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by RICCI DAVIS. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5254879) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wegg, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
