ZIMMERMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
MATTHEW ZIMMERMAN |
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY |
1:2019cv00742 |
February 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 Remark - The Southern District of Indiana receives email notice from the Clerk of the Northern District of Florida regarding electronic case transfer. This case was received electronically by the Northern District of Florida on 4/18/2019 and was assigned case number 3:19-cv-00756 in the receiving court. (MAC) |
Filing 21 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Northern District of Florida. Case transferred electronically to Northern District of Florida, IN RE: MDL 2885 on April 17, 2019. (MAC) |
Filing 20 CLOSED TRANSFER to the Northern District of Florida IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL. 2885 per CTO 2. (MAC) |
|
Filing 18 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to 6/14/19 in which to #1 Complaint Pending Further Order of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, filed by Defendant AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Conditional Transfer Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Pittman, Alexandria) |
|
Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to June 11, 2019 to Respond to Complaint and to Cancel Initial Pre-Trial Conference Pending Further Order of the United States Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation, filed by Defendant 3M COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Transfer Order and Conditional Transfer Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Mortimer, Renee) |
|
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexandria Hanauer Pittman on behalf of Defendant AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Pittman, Alexandria) |
Filing 13 Notice of Parties First Extension of Time re #1 Complaint Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendant AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Arceneaux, Adam) Modified on 3/15/2019 (DWH). |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC identifying Corporate Parent 3M COMPANY for AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC.. (Arceneaux, Adam) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Arceneaux on behalf of Defendant AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Arceneaux, Adam) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott B. Cockrum on behalf of Defendant 3M COMPANY. (Cockrum, Scott) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by 3M COMPANY. (Mortimer, Renee) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant 3M COMPANY. (Mortimer, Renee) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Renee J. Mortimer on behalf of Defendant 3M COMPANY. (Mortimer, Renee) |
Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to 3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (REO) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Loren Karns on behalf of Plaintiff MATTHEW ZIMMERMAN. (Karns, Timothy) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen M. Wagner on behalf of Plaintiff MATTHEW ZIMMERMAN. (Wagner, Stephen) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Ruskin Reese on behalf of Plaintiff MATTHEW ZIMMERMAN. (Reese, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by MATTHEW ZIMMERMAN. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5292256) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons 3M Company, #3 Proposed Summons Aearo Technologies LLC)(Reese, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.