BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. ELLINGTON TRUCKING LLC et al
| BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. |
| SHARON HARRIS ELLINGTON, SHARON HARRIS and ELLINGTON TRUCKING LLC |
| 1:2019cv00947 |
| March 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JDH) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to SHARON HARRIS ELLINGTON and ELLINGTON TRUCKING LLC. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. identifying Corporate Parent BMO FINANCIAL GROUP for BMO HARRIS BANK N.A... (Haney, James) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by James K. Haney on behalf of Plaintiff BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.. (Haney, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SHARON HARRIS ELLINGTON, ELLINGTON TRUCKING LLC, filed by BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5321038) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Transfer Acknowledgments, #2 Exhibit B - Loan and Security Agreement 1, #3 Exhibit C - Loan and Security Agreement 2, #4 Exhibit D - Continuing Guaranties, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Haney, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
