DALY v. NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC. et al
DEREK DALY |
WISH-TV and NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC. |
1:2019cv00976 |
March 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
Richard L Young |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jessica Laurin Meek on behalf of Defendants NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC., WISH-TV. (Meek, Jessica) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret M. Christensen on behalf of Defendants NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC., WISH-TV. (Christensen, Margaret) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel P. Byron on behalf of Defendants NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC., WISH-TV. (Byron, Daniel) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Superior Court 5, case number 29D05-1902-CT-001348, filed by All Defendants. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5325162) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Docket Sheet and State Court Record (Complaint, Appearance of Tim Stoesz, Summons, Notice of Filing of Amended Complaint, Notice of Service Nexstar Wish-TV), #2 Exhibit Complaint for Damages, #3 Exhibit Notice of Filing, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Christensen, Margaret) |
Filing 1 Corporate Disclosure Statement by NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC., WISH-TV identifying Corporate Parent NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC. for NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC., WISH-TV.. (Christensen, Margaret) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.