NASH v. 3M COMPANY et al
Plaintiff: DALE NASH
Defendant: AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Case Number: 1:2019cv01062
Filed: March 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2019 Filing 17 Remark - The Southern District of Indiana receives email notice from the Clerk of the Northern District of Florida regarding electronic case transfer. This case was received electronically by the Northern District of Florida on 4/22/2019 and was assigned case number 3:19-cv-00843 in the receiving court. (MAC)
April 19, 2019 Filing 16 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Northern District of Florida. Case transferred electronically to Northern District of Florida, IN RE: MDL 2885 on April 17, 2019. (MAC)
April 19, 2019 Filing 15 CLOSED TRANSFER to the Northern District of Florida IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL. 2885 per CTO 2. (MAC)
April 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Unopposed Motions for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Complaint Pending Further Order of the United States Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation. [Dkts. #12 & #13 .] The Court, being duly advised, hereby GRANTS Defendants' motions. Defendants shall file their responses to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before June 21, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 4/18/2019. (SWM)
April 16, 2019 Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to 6/21/19 in which to #1 Notice of Removal Respond to Complaint Pending Further Order of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, filed by Defendant AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Conditional Transfer Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Pittman, Alexandria)
April 15, 2019 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to June 21, 2019 to Respond to Complaint Pending Further Order of the United States Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation, filed by Defendant 3M COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Transfer Order and Conditional Transfer Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Mortimer, Renee)
March 22, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Arceneaux, Adam)
March 21, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant 3M COMPANY. (Mortimer, Renee)
March 18, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexandria Hanauer Pittman on behalf of Defendant AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Pittman, Alexandria)
March 18, 2019 Filing 8 CONSENT to Removal by AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Arceneaux, Adam)
March 18, 2019 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC identifying Corporate Parent 3M COMPANY for AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC.. (Arceneaux, Adam)
March 18, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Arceneaux on behalf of Defendant AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Arceneaux, Adam)
March 18, 2019 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET)
March 17, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott B. Cockrum on behalf of Defendant 3M COMPANY. (Cockrum, Scott)
March 17, 2019 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by 3M COMPANY. (Mortimer, Renee)
March 17, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Renee J. Mortimer on behalf of Defendant 3M COMPANY. (Mortimer, Renee)
March 17, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, Civil Division 7, case number 49D07-1902-CT-005798, filed by 3M COMPANY. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5337514) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Record (Docket Sheet, Appearance, Complaint, Summons to 3M, Summons to Aearo, Notice of Order of Consolidation, Service of Summons to 3M, Service of Summons to Aearo, Appearance, Appearance, Motion for Enlargement, Motion to Deem, Order on Consolidated Cases, Appearance, Motion for Enlargement, Motion to Deem, Appearance, Order Granting Motion to Deem, Order Granting Motion for Enlargement), #2 Exhibit 2 - Operative Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mortimer, Renee)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NASH v. 3M COMPANY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DALE NASH
Represented By: Jason Ruskin Reese
Represented By: Timothy Loren Karns
Represented By: Stephen M. Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Represented By: Alexandria Hanauer Pittman
Represented By: Adam Arceneaux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Represented By: Renee J. Mortimer
Represented By: Scott B. Cockrum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?