TOYOTA MATERIAL HANDLING, U.S.A., INC. v. RAVAS USA, LLC
Plaintiff: Toyota Material Handling, U.S.A., Inc.
3Rd Party Plaintiff: RAVAS USA, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant: TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. and STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC.
Case Number: 1:2019cv01088
Filed: March 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2019 The Southern District of Indiana receives email notice from the Northern District of Illinois regarding electronic case transfer. This case was received electronically by the Northern District of Illinois on 7/10/2019 and was assigned case number 1:19-cv-04645 in the receiving court. (JDC)
July 10, 2019 Filing 66 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Northen District of Illinois. Case transferred electronically to Northen District of Illinois, on 7/10/2019. (JDC)
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 65 CLOSED TRANSFER to the United States District Court for the NorthernDistrict of Illinois - Eastern Division for all further proceedings. This cause coming to be heard on the motion of the plaintiff #56 , Toyota Material Handling, U.S.A., Inc. ("TMHU") to Transfer Venue for this cause from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and due notice having been given, it is hereby ordered: 1. TMHU's Motion is Granted. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 7/9/2019.(JDC)
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER granting #58 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Kerry Mohan for STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC. added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 7/9/2019 (dist made) (CBU)
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER granting #57 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Daniel J. Mohan for STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC. added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 7/9/2019 (dist made) (CBU)
July 8, 2019 Filing 62 Exhibit List (Preliminary), filed by Plaintiff TOYOTA MATERIAL HANDLING, U.S.A., INC.. (Albright, Andrew)
July 8, 2019 Filing 61 Witness List (Preliminary), filed by Plaintiff TOYOTA MATERIAL HANDLING, U.S.A., INC.. (Albright, Andrew)
July 8, 2019 Filing 60 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff TOYOTA MATERIAL HANDLING, U.S.A., INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Third Amended Complaint, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Albright, Andrew)
July 2, 2019 Filing 59 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Third-Party Complaint, filed by Third Party Defendant TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Greenspan, Jeffrey)
July 2, 2019 Filing 58 MOTION for Attorney(s) Kerry Mohan to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5509540), filed by Third Party Defendant STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Olds, James)
July 2, 2019 Filing 57 MOTION for Attorney(s) Daniel J. Mohan to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5509513), filed by Third Party Defendant STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Olds, James)
July 1, 2019 Filing 56 Unopposed MOTION to Transfer Case , filed by Plaintiff TOYOTA MATERIAL HANDLING, U.S.A., INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Transferring Venue)(Albright, Andrew)
July 1, 2019 Filing 55 NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosures , filed by Third Party Plaintiff RAVAS USA, LLC, Defendant RAVAS USA, LLC. (Peters, Tyler)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER: This matter comes before the Court on Third-Party Defendants' motions to extend their deadlines for serving Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures, filing preliminary witness and exhibit lists, and serving responses to Third Party Plaintiff's settlement demand. [Dkts. #49 & #52 .] Those motions are hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART the motion. The Court hereby DENIES Third Party Defendants' requests to extend its deadline to file their file preliminary witness and exhibit lists or to serve their responses to Third Party Plaintiff's settlement demand pending ruling on Third Party Defendants' filed, or to be filed, motions. Third Party Defendants' delayed entry into the case was considered and already factored into the deadlines established by the Court in the Case Management Plan. However, Third Party Defendants' requests to extend their deadline to serve Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures are hereby GRANTED IN PART. Accordingly, paragraph III(A) of the approved Case Management Plan [Dkt. 29 at 3] is hereby amended as follows (see Order for established deadlines). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 6/28/2019. (SWM)
June 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER granting Defendant/Third-Party #50 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re #50 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to July 15, 2019 re #41 MOTION to Dismiss . Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 6/27/2019. (JDC)
June 27, 2019 Filing 52 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time For Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures, Preliminary Witness and Exhibit Lists and Settlement Proposal, filed by Third Party Defendant TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Greenspan, Jeffrey)
June 27, 2019 Filing 51 Submission of Proposed Order , re #49 MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Rule 26 Disclosures, Witness and Exhibit Lists and Settlement Response, filed by Third Party Defendant STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC.. (Sullivan, Sean)
June 26, 2019 Filing 50 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to July 15, 2019 re #41 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Third Party Plaintiff RAVAS USA, LLC, Defendant RAVAS USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Peters, Tyler)
June 26, 2019 Filing 49 MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Rule 26 Disclosures, Witness and Exhibit Lists and Settlement Response, filed by Third Party Defendant STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC.. (Sullivan, Sean)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER granting #44 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Sean M. Sullivan for STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC. added. If not already registered with the Court's Electronic Filing System, Sean M. Sullivan is ordered to register within ten (10) days of the entry of this order. Copy to Sean M. Sullivan via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 6/12/2019. (SWM)
June 11, 2019 Filing 47 NOTICE of Appearance by James G. Argionis on behalf of Third Party Defendant TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.. (Argionis, James)
June 11, 2019 Filing 46 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.. (Greenspan, Jeffrey)
June 11, 2019 Filing 45 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey B. Greenspan on behalf of Third Party Defendant TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.. (Greenspan, Jeffrey)
June 11, 2019 Filing 44 MOTION for Attorney(s) Sean M. Sullivan to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5472716), filed by Third Party Defendant STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Olds, James)
June 10, 2019 Filing 43 NOTICE of Appearance by John C. Duffey on behalf of Third Party Defendant STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC.. (Duffey, John)
June 10, 2019 Filing 42 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #41 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Third Party Defendant STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC.. (Olds, James)
June 10, 2019 Filing 41 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Third Party Defendant STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Paul Walker, #2 Exhibit A - Ravas POs, #3 Exhibit B - Ravas B - Order Acknowledgment, #4 Exhibit C - Shipping Pack List)(Olds, James)
June 10, 2019 Filing 40 Corporate Disclosure Statement by STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC.. (Olds, James)
June 10, 2019 Filing 39 NOTICE of Appearance by James F. Olds on behalf of Third Party Defendant STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC.. (Olds, James)
June 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER granting #35 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney James G. Argionis for TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. added. If not already registered with the Court's Electronic Filing System, James G. Argionis is ordered to register within ten (10) days of the entry of this order. Copy to James G. Argionis via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 6/7/2019. (SWM)
June 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting #34 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Jeffrey B. Greenspan for TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. added. If not already registered with the Court's Electronic Filing System, Jeffrey B. Greenspan is ordered to register within ten (10) days of the entry of this order. Copy Jeffrey B. Greenspan via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 6/7/2019. (SWM)
June 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER granting Third-Party Defendant's #33 Motion for Extension of Time to File response to Ravas USA's Third-Party Complaint to 7/8/2019. No further enlargement of this deadline is anticipated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 6/6/2019. (SWM)
June 6, 2019 Filing 35 MOTION for Attorney(s) James G. Argionis to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5466665), filed by Third Party Defendant TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of J Argionis, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(O'Malley, Katherine)
June 6, 2019 Filing 34 MOTION for Attorney(s) Jeffrey B. Greenspan to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5466569), filed by Third Party Defendant TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of J Greenspan, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(O'Malley, Katherine)
June 5, 2019 Filing 33 MOTION for Extension of Time to 7/8/2019 to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Third-Party Complaint, filed by Third Party Defendant TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(O'Malley, Katherine)
June 5, 2019 Filing 32 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Werner O'Malley on behalf of Third Party Defendant TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.. (O'Malley, Katherine)
June 5, 2019 Filing 31 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A. McCaskey on behalf of Plaintiff TOYOTA MATERIAL HANDLING, U.S.A., INC.. (McCaskey, Michael)
May 31, 2019 Filing 30 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Third-Party Complaint and Plaintiff's Complaint served on Transcell Technology, Inc. and Streator Industrial Handling, Inc. on May 20, 2019, filed by RAVAS USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proof of Service)(Jost, Anthony)
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER: CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED AS AMENDED. Dispositive Motions due by 5/1/2020. Discovery due by 4/3/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 5/15/2019.(SWM) (Main Document 29 replaced on 5/30/2019) (GD).
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore: Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference held on 5/15/2019. Approved Case Management Plan, as amended, to be entered by separate order. Telephonic Status Conference set for 7/17/2019 at 11:00 AM (Eastern Time). Settlement Conference set for 11/22/2019 at 9:00 AM (Eastern Time) in room #257, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana. *SEE ORDER FOR DEADLINES.* Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. (GD)
May 15, 2019 Filing 27 Summons Issued as to STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC. (LAB) (JDC)
May 15, 2019 Filing 26 Summons Issued as to TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.(LAB) (JDC)
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDERS. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 5/15/2019.(SWM)
May 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting #19 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Christopher J. Sherman for RAVAS USA, LLC added. If not already registered with the Court's Electronic Filing System, Christopher J. Sherman is ordered to register within ten (10) days of the entry of this order. Copy to Christopher J. Sherman via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 5/14/2019. (SWM) (Main Document 24 replaced on 5/15/2019) (SWM).
May 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER granting #18 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Tyler Peters for RAVAS USA, LLC added. If not already registered with the Court's Electronic Filing System, Tyler Peters is ordered to register within ten (10) days of the entry of this order. Copy to Tyler Peters via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 5/14/2019. (SWM)
May 14, 2019 Filing 22 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC., STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC., filed by RAVAS USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Second Amended Complaint, #3 Proposed Summons Transcell Summons, #4 Proposed Summons Streator Summons)(Jost, Anthony)
May 14, 2019 Filing 21 Defendant's ANSWER to #15 Amended Complaint and Jury Demand, filed by RAVAS USA, LLC.(Jost, Anthony)
May 13, 2019 Filing 20 Proposed CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Plaintiff TOYOTA MATERIAL HANDLING, U.S.A., INC. . (Albright, Andrew)
May 10, 2019 Filing 19 MOTION for Attorney(s) Christopher J. Sherman to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5424608), filed by Defendant RAVAS USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Jost, Anthony)
May 10, 2019 Filing 18 MOTION for Attorney(s) Tyler Peters to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5424597), filed by Defendant RAVAS USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Jost, Anthony)
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER denying Parties' #14 Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with Scheduling Order. The parties shall file a proposed Case Management Plan on or before May 13, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 5/9/2019. (SWM)
May 8, 2019 Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT (Second) against RAVAS USA, LLC, filed by TOYOTA MATERIAL HANDLING, U.S.A., INC..(Albright, Andrew)
May 8, 2019 Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to to Comply With Scheduling Order , filed by Plaintiff TOYOTA MATERIAL HANDLING, U.S.A., INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion)(Albright, Andrew)
May 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Second Order Regarding Jurisdiction - Plaintiff Toyota Material Handling, USA, Inc. filed its Complaint alleging breach of contract against Defendant RAVAS USA, LLC, asserting the court's diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Review of the jurisdictional allegations revealed that they were insufficient because it pleaded RAVAS USA, LLC's jurisdiction as if it were a corporation when its name identifies it as a limited liability company. ECF No. #11 2.) Plaintiff since filed an Amended Complaint, but this, too, insufficiently pleads jurisdiction. As noted in the prior order, the citizenship of a limited partnership, limited liability company, or other unincorporated association is the citizenship of each of its partners or members. See White Pearl Inversiones S.A. (Uruguay) v. Cemusa, Inc., 647 F.3d 684, 686 (7th Cir. 2011). In correcting the insufficiency in pleading a limited liability company's citizenship, the Amended Complaint alleges that Defendant RAVAS USA, LLC has as its sole member RAVAS Europe B.V., a company incorporated under the laws of The Netherlands. ECF No. #12 2. Thus, the Amended Complaint reveals that Plaintiff's citizenship depends on the citizenship of its member--a foreign company. For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, the citizenship of a foreign company is determined based on the American business form that the foreign company most closely resembles. See White Pearl Invesiones S.A. (Uruguay) v. Cemusa, Inc., 647 F.3d 684 (7th Cir. 2011). The Amended Complaint does not contain any allegations about what American business form RAVAS Europe B.V. most closely resembles. Thus, Plaintiff must amend its complaint again to sufficiently plead jurisdiction. An example of an amended complaint that properly addressed a foreign entity issue can be found in McGuire v. Organon USA, Inc., No. 1:13-cv-1596-JMS-MJD ECF No. #11 at 2 3. The Court finds that, in order to avoid a needless expenditure of resources, Plaintiff should sufficiently plead jurisdiction prior to the initial pretrial conference set for May 15, 2019. Therefore, Plaintiff is ALLOWED until May 13, 2019 within which to file an amended complaint to properly plead the court's subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 5/6/2019.(JDC)
May 3, 2019 Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against RAVAS USA, LLC, filed by TOYOTA MATERIAL HANDLING, U.S.A., INC..(Albright, Andrew)
April 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Order Directing Plaintiff to Properly Plead Jurisdiction - Plaintiff Toyota material Handling, USA, Inc. filed its Complaint alleging breach of contract against Defendant RAVAS USA, LLC on March 18, 2019, asserting the court's diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Review of the jurisdictional allegations reveals that they are insufficient. A federal court has an "independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from any party." Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006). A party cannot confer subject-matter jurisdiction on a federal court where it does not otherwise exist. See Evergreen Square of Cudahy v. Wis. Hous. & Econ. Dev. Auth., 776 F.3d 463, 465 (7th Cir. 2015). Similarly, counsel has a professional obligation to analyze subject-matter jurisdiction. Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Corp., 671 F.3d 669, 670 (7th Cir. 2012). The citizenship of a limited partnership, limited liability company, or other unincorporated association is the citizenship of each of its partners or members. See White Pearl Inversiones S.A. (Uruguay) v. Cemusa, Inc., 647 F.3d 684, 686 (7th Cir. 2011). To allege diversity jurisdiction, "the citizenship of unincorporated associations must be traced through however many layers of partners or members there may be." Meyerson v. Harrah's E. Chi. Casino, 299 F.3d 616, 617 (7th Cir. 2002). "Failure to go through all the layers can result in dismissal for want of jurisdiction." Id. Asserting that all partners are citizens of "X" or that no partners are citizens of "X" is insufficient. See Peters v. Astrazeneca LP, 224 F. App'x. 503, 505 (7th Cir. 2007) (noting the insufficiency of a limited partnership asserting that none of its partners were citizens destroying diversity "rather than furnishing the citizenship of all of its partners so that [the court] could determine its citizenship"). Jurisdictional allegations must be made on personal knowledge, not on information and belief, to invoke the court's jurisdiction. See America's Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992) (only a statement about jurisdiction "made on personal knowledge has any value" and a statement made "'to the best of my knowledge and belief' is insufficient" to engage diversity jurisdiction). Plaintiff is ALLOWED through May 10, 2019, within which to file an amended complaint to properly plead the court's subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 4/30/2019. (JDC)
April 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 5/15/2019 11:30 AM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. Counsel shall attend the conference by calling the designated telephone number, to be provided by the Court via email generated by the Court's ECF system. The parties shall file a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") no fewer than seven days before the pretrial conference. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 4/11/2019.(SWM)
April 10, 2019 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by RAVAS USA, LLC identifying Corporate Parent RAVAS Europe B.V. for RAVAS USA, LLC.. (Jost, Anthony)
April 10, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant RAVAS USA, LLC. (Jost, Anthony)
April 10, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony R. Jost on behalf of Defendant RAVAS USA, LLC. (Jost, Anthony)
April 2, 2019 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TOYOTA MATERIAL HANDLING, U.S.A., INC.. (Albright, Andrew)
March 20, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew J. Albright on behalf of Plaintiff TOYOTA MATERIAL HANDLING, U.S.A., INC.. (Albright, Andrew)
March 20, 2019 Filing 4 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC)
March 19, 2019 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET)
March 19, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to RAVAS USA, LLC. (HET)
March 18, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RAVAS USA, LLC, filed by Toyota Material Handling, U.S.A., Inc.. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5339890) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Quote from RAVAS USA LLC, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Albright, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TOYOTA MATERIAL HANDLING, U.S.A., INC. v. RAVAS USA, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Toyota Material Handling, U.S.A., Inc.
Represented By: Andrew J. Albright
Represented By: Michael A. McCaskey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party plaintiff: RAVAS USA, LLC
Represented By: Tyler Peters
Represented By: Anthony R. Jost
Represented By: Christopher J. Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party defendant: TRANSCELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Represented By: Jeffrey B. Greenspan
Represented By: Katherine Werner O'Malley
Represented By: James G. Argionis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party defendant: STREATOR INDUSTRIAL HANDLING, INC.
Represented By: Sean Malone Sullivan
Represented By: John C. Duffey
Represented By: Kerry Mohan
Represented By: James F. Olds
Represented By: Daniel J. Mohan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?