HALSEY v. HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.
| JR. LOUIS G. HALSEY and LOUIS G. HALSEY, JR. |
| HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD. |
| 1:2019cv01114 |
| March 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER: The Court has been advised by counsel that a settlement has been reached in this matter. Accordingly, any pending motions are denied, without prejudice, as moot, and all previously ordered dates relating to discovery, filings, schedules, conferences and trial, if any, are vacated. Parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal within 60 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 6/14/2019.(SWM)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Settlement, filed by Plaintiff LOUIS G. HALSEY, JR (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 15 Witness List , filed by Defendant HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD., Exhibit List , filed by Defendant HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.. (Kalas, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED AS AMENDED. Parties appeared by counsel on 5/10/2019, for an Initial Pretrial Conference. Dispositive Motions due by 3/20/2020. Discovery due by 1/20/2020. Defendant shall serve a settlement response by May 24, 2019, with a copy to the Magistrate Judge via email (MJBaker@insd.uscourts.gov), which shall specifically indicate whether the Court should schedule a prompt settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 5/28/2019.(SWM)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD..(Kalas, Jennifer) |
| Filing 11 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Plaintiff LOUIS G. HALSEY, JR . (Volheim, Nathan) |
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 5/10/2019 03:30 PM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. Parties shall participate in this conference by counsel. The information needed by counsel of record to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by separate notification. If a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") has not yet been filed, the parties are ordered to confer prior to the initial pretrial conference and prepare a proposed CMP. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 4/9/2019.(SWM)
|
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by LOUIS G. HALSEY, JR. HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD. waiver sent on 3/20/2019. (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Schultz on behalf of Defendant HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.. (Schultz, David) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Jay Kalas on behalf of Defendant HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.. (Kalas, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.. (HET) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric D. Coleman on behalf of Plaintiff LOUIS G. HALSEY. (Coleman, Eric) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis on behalf of Plaintiff LOUIS G. HALSEY. (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan C. Volheim on behalf of Plaintiff LOUIS G. HALSEY. (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD., filed by LOUIS G. HALSEY. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5343002) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Volheim, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
