THOMPSON v. ZATECKY
Petitioner: SHAYNE THOMPSON
Respondent: D. ZATECKY
Case Number: 1:2019cv01357
Filed: April 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referring Judge: Doris L Pryor
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2019 Filing 9 RETURN TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, re #3 Order to Show Cause (Disciplinary), filed by D. ZATECKY.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Conduct Report, #2 Exhibit A-1 - Confiscation Slip, #3 Exhibit A-2 - Confiscated materials, #4 Exhibit B - Screening Report, #5 Exhibit B-1 - Lay Advocate Form, #6 Exhibit C - Hearing Report, #7 Exhibit D - Facility Appeal, #8 Exhibit E - DOC Appeal and Response)(Talbot, Monika)
May 22, 2019 Filing 8 Respondent's Notice of 42-day Extension of Deadline to File a Return to Order Show Cause, filed by D. ZATECKY. Return to Order to Show Cause deadline is 7/3/2019. (Talbot, Monika)
May 21, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Monika P. Talbot on behalf of Respondent D. ZATECKY. (Talbot, Monika)
May 15, 2019 Filing 6 RECEIPT #IP065111 for Habeas filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (REO)
April 15, 2019 Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by SHAYNE THOMPSON. (JDH)
April 15, 2019 Filing 4 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by SHAYNE THOMPSON located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by SHAYNE THOMPSON to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (JDH)
April 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary) - The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 5/22/2019. Petitioner shall have through May 10, 2019, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. (See Order). Copy to Shayne Thompson via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/10/2019.(JDH)
April 3, 2019 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
April 3, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by SHAYNE THOMPSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Disciplinary documents)(REO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THOMPSON v. ZATECKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D. ZATECKY
Represented By: Monika P. Talbot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SHAYNE THOMPSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?