REAVES v. JONES et al
| KEVIN REAVES |
| ROLLAND and JERRY JONES |
| 1:2019cv01411 |
| April 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER - Plaintiff's custodian is directed to withhold sums from the inmate trust account of KEVIN REAVES, 161700, and to forward such sums to the Clerk of this Court at 46 East Ohio Street, Room 105, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, consistent with paragraph 2 of this Entry. The appropriate cause number, 1:19-CV-01411-SEB- DML, should be placed on each payment sent to the Clerk. The plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #8 , is granted. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 7/3/2019. Copies Mailed (CKM)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff KEVIN REAVES. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CKM) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER - To proceed in this case, the plaintiff must still pay the $400 filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis. He shall have until July 5, 2019, in which to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis by attaching a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action on April 8, 2019. Otherwise, the plaintiff must pay the $400.00 filing fee. Failure to follow these instructions may result in the dismissal of this action without further warning. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 6/13/2019.(NAD)
|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE re #5 ENTRY - on In-forma Pauperis Status, filed by Plaintiff KEVIN REAVES. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CKM) |
|
Filing 5
Entry on In Forma Pauperis Status - On April 15, 2019, the Court ordered the plaintiff to file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by attaching a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action or to pay the $400.00 filing fee as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2). The plaintiff has failed to do so or otherwise respond by the deadline. The plaintiff shall have through June 21, 2019, to comply with the Court's previous order or to explain why doing so is not possible. The failure to do so by this date will result in the dismissal of this action without further warning. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 5/24/2019.(NAD)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by KEVIN REAVES. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CKM) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY - Directing Further Proceedings; The plaintiff shall have through May 10, 2019, in which to either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that he lacks the financial ability to do so. If he seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis, his request must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action on April 8, 2019. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/15/2019. Copy Mailed.(CKM) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JERRY JONES, ROLLAND, filed by KEVIN REAVES. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
