KREILEIN v. DAVIS
Plaintiff: ALAN KREILEIN
Defendant: DAVIS
Case Number: 1:2019cv01431
Filed: April 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Referring Judge: Matthew P Brookman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2019 Filing 9 RECEIPT #IP065790 for initial partial filing fee in the amount of $20.00, paid by Plaintiff. (REO)
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER - granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #7 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Nineteen Dollars and Sixty-Nine Cents ($19.69). The plaintiff shall have through July 9, 2019, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 6/13/2019. (NAD)
June 6, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ALAN KREILEIN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Inmate Trust Account)(CKM)
May 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER - granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File; The plaintiff's motion for an extension of time, dkt. #5 , is granted. He shall have through June 14, 2019, in which to file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 5/20/2019. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
May 13, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to file In Forma Pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ALAN KREILEIN. (NAD)
April 17, 2019 Filing 4 ENTRY - Directing Further Proceedings; The plaintiff shall have through May 15, 2019, in which to either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that he lacks the financial ability to do so. If he seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis, his request must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action on April 9, 2019. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/17/2019. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
April 9, 2019 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET)
April 9, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against DAVIS, filed by ALAN KREILEIN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Grievance Documents, #2 Proposed Summons)(HET)
April 9, 2019 Filing 1 ENTRY DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION 1:19-cv-00749-JMS-DML, Directing Entry of Final Judgment, and Directing a new civil rights action be opened. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/9/2019.(HET) Modified on 4/9/2019 to change docket text (HET). Modified on 4/10/2019 (HET).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KREILEIN v. DAVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ALAN KREILEIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?