HORTON v. CACH, LLC
| WENDY HORTON |
| CACH, LLC |
| 1:2019cv01479 |
| April 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLOSED DISMISSED (Marginal Notation) - The Court acknowledges Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, dkt. #8 . Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 5/28/2019. (DWH) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss with prejudice, filed by Plaintiff WENDY HORTON. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order of dismissal)(Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, John Thomas Steinkamp hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Pending Cases for John T. Steinkamp) (Steinkamp, John) |
Filing 6
ORDER Directing Filing of Documents Authorizing Dismissal: The court has been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case. Therefore, all pending motions, if any, are now DENIED AS MOOT and all previously ordered dates relating to discovery, filings, schedules, conferences, and trial, if any, are VACATED. Within thirty days of the date of this entry, counsel for the plaintiff shall file a motion to dismiss this cause and submit an order for the Court's signature ordering the dismissal of this action or a stipulation of dismissal (consistent with the agreement of the parties). Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 4/29/2019.(SWM)
|
| Filing 5 RETURN of Service, filed by WENDY HORTON. CACH, LLC served on 4/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Service)(Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CACH, LLC. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Thomas Steinkamp on behalf of Plaintiff WENDY HORTON. (Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against CACH, LLC, filed by WENDY HORTON. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5380656) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Debt Collector License Information, #2 Exhibit 2 - The October 30, 2018, letter sent by Plaintiff's counsel, #3 Exhibit 3 - Plaintiff's Affidavit, #4 Exhibit A - Relevant pages of Plaintiff's January 16, 2019, TransUnion credit report, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Steinkamp, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HORTON v. CACH, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: WENDY HORTON | |
| Represented By: | John Thomas Steinkamp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CACH, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
