BEAL v. MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT
| RONALD BEAL |
| MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT |
| 1:2019cv01506 |
| April 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED AS AMENDED. Parties appeared by counsel on 6/14/2019, for an Initial Pretrial Conference. Dispositive Motions due by 4/16/2020. Discovery due by 2/16/2020. Status Conference set for 7/10/2019 04:30 PM in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. Plaintiff shall serve a settlement proposal by June 21, 2019, and Defendant shall serve a response by June 28, 2019. The parties shall submit copies of their settlement proposal/demand to the Magistrate Judge via email (MJBaker@insd.uscourts.gov). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 6/18/2019.(SWM)
|
| Filing 7 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Defendant MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT . (Swider, David) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) , filed by MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT.(Swider, David) |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 6/14/2019 09:00 AM in room #234, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. If a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") has not yet been filed, the parties are ordered to confer prior to the initial pretrial conference and prepare a proposed CMP. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 5/13/2019.(SWM)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Wohlford on behalf of Defendant MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT. (Wohlford, Mark) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David L. Swider on behalf of Defendant MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT. (Swider, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Delaware Circuit Court, case number 18C01-1903-PL-000036, filed by MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5384481) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record (Complaint, Summons, First Amended Complaint, Summons, Appearances, Motion for Enlargement of Time, Order), #3 First Amended Complaint)(Swider, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BEAL v. MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT | |
| Represented By: | Mark Wohlford |
| Represented By: | David L. Swider |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RONALD BEAL | |
| Represented By: | Brian M. Pierce |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
