HORNKOHL v. DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC. et al
Plaintiff: JOYCE HORNKOHL
Defendant: DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC. and DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC.
Case Number: 1:2019cv01684
Filed: April 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #11 Motion for Continuance. Initial Pretrial Conference RESET for 8/27/2019 01:30 PM in room #234, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. A proposed Case Management Plan shall be filed no less than three days prior to the conference. Copy to Daniel C. Burke via US Mail Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 6/18/2019.(SWM)
June 14, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION for Continuance of Pretrial Conference, filed by Plaintiff JOYCE HORNKOHL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dassow, Robert)
May 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER - Defendants removed this action to this Court on April 26, 2019, alleging that the Court has diversity jurisdiction over this case. Dkt. 1 at 3. Local Rule 81-1(b) provides: Within 30 days after the filing of the notice of removal, every plaintiff who has not filed a motion to remand must file a statement responding to the notice of removal's allegations as to the citizenship of the parties and the amount in controversy. If the plaintiff lacks sufficient information upon which to form a belief about those allegations despite meeting and conferring in good faith with the removing party about them, the plaintiff may so state. More than 30 days have passed since the filing of the notice of removal, yet Plaintiff has not moved to remand or filed a response. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to comply with Local Rule 81-1 by June 24, 2019. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 5/31/2019. Copy to Daniel C. Burke via US Mail. (DWH)
May 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 7/1/2019 02:30 PM in room #234, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. If a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") has not yet been filed, the parties are ordered to confer prior to the initial pretrial conference and prepare a proposed CMP. See Order for additional information. Copy to Daniel C. Burke via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 5/31/2019.(SWM)
May 3, 2019 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint for Damages and Jury Demand, filed by DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC., DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC..(Larson, Joel)
April 30, 2019 Filing 7 TRIAL PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge James Patrick Hanlon. (DWH)
April 29, 2019 Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
April 26, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing - Certificate of Filing Notice of Removal in State Court by All Defendants (Eaton, Joseph)
April 26, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Joel Thaddeus Larson, Jr on behalf of Defendants DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC., DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.. (Larson, Joel)
April 26, 2019 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC., DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC. identifying Corporate Parent JOHNSON & JOHNSON for DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC., DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC... (Eaton, Joseph)
April 26, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Gregory Eaton on behalf of Defendants DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC., DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.. (Eaton, Joseph)
April 26, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court No. 3, case number 49D03-1902-007140, filed by All Defendants. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5401578) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Complaint, Appearance, Summonses (9), Certificate of Issuance of Summons, Appearance for Defendants, Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice, Order of Dismissal, Notice of Automatic 30-Day Enlargement of Time, Order Granting Enlargement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit B - Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages and Jury Demand)(Eaton, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HORNKOHL v. DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOYCE HORNKOHL
Represented By: Robert Thomas Dassow
Represented By: Daniel C. Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
Represented By: Joel Thaddeus Larson, Jr.
Represented By: Joseph Gregory Eaton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC.
Represented By: Joel Thaddeus Larson, Jr.
Represented By: Joseph Gregory Eaton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?