DILLMAN v. SAUL
Plaintiff: DAWN S. DILLMAN
Defendant: ACTING COMM'R NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Case Number: 1:2019cv01790
Filed: May 2, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER - Plaintiff seeks judicial review of the defendant Commissioner's denial of Plaintiff's claim for Social Security benefits based on disability. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, the Court now enters the following orders. ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION*** Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/3/2019.(JDC)
July 1, 2019 Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT of Administrative Record of Social Security Administration, by ANDREW M. SAUL. (Attachments: #1 court transcript index, #2 administrative documents, #3 payment documents, #4 jurisdictional documents, #5 non disability related documents, #6 disability related documents, #7 medical records part 1, #8 medical records part 2, #9 medical records part 3, #10 medical records part 4, #11 medical records part 5, #12 medical records part 6, #13 medical records part 7, #14 medical records part 8, #15 medical records part 9, #16 medical records part 10, #17 medical records part 11, #18 medical records part 12, #19 medical records part 13, #20 medical records part 14, #21 medical records part 15)(Wierenga, Julian)
June 24, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Wierenga, Julian)
May 3, 2019 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
May 2, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph R. Wambach on behalf of Plaintiff DAWN S. DILLMAN. (Wambach, Joseph)
May 2, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy E. Burns on behalf of Plaintiff DAWN S. DILLMAN. (Burns, Timothy)
May 2, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Frederick Richter on behalf of Plaintiff DAWN S. DILLMAN. (Richter, Matthew)
May 2, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL, filed by DAWN S. DILLMAN. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5411836) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Richter, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DILLMAN v. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACTING COMM'R NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Represented By: Julian Clifford Wierenga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAWN S. DILLMAN
Represented By: Matthew Frederick Richter
Represented By: Timothy E. Burns
Represented By: Joseph R. Wambach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?