CANNON v. MW STAFFING SOLUTIONS
| DEATRA CANNON |
| MW STAFFING SOLUTIONS and WM STAFFING, INC. |
| 1:2019cv01821 |
| May 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by DEATRA CANNON. WM STAFFING, INC. served on 5/17/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Cummings, Paul) Modified on 5/29/2019 - Edited text to reflect type of service (NAD). |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Damages and Request for Jury Trial against MW STAFFING SOLUTIONS, filed by DEATRA CANNON.(Cummings, Paul) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Amended Complaint for Damages and Request for Jury Trial by DEATRA CANNON (Cummings, Paul) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MW STAFFING SOLUTIONS. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul J. Cummings on behalf of Plaintiff DEATRA CANNON. (Cummings, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Request for Jury Trial against MW STAFFING SOLUTIONS, filed by DEATRA CANNON. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5414911) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cummings, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
