MALLARD v. ZATECHY
| DONALD MALLARD |
| DUSHAN ZATECHY |
| 1:2019cv01996 |
| May 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT -The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 6/18/2019. (CKM) |
Filing 8
ORDER - DISMISSING HABEAS ACTION; Mr. Mallard must obtain authorization from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals before this Court may consider his habeas petition. This action is dismissed for a lack of jurisdiction. Final Judgment in accordance with this decision shall issue. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 6/18/2019. (CKM)
|
| Filing 7 Petitioner's RESPONSE re #5 Order to Show Cause, filed by Petitioner DONALD MALLARD. (CKM) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER - granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 6/11/2019. (CKM)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Mr. Mallard's 2254 habeas petition appears to be second or successive and, if it is, the Court must dismiss this action for lack of jurisdiction. Therefore, Mr. Mallard has through June 17, 2019, to explain to the Court why this action should not be dismissed as a second or successive 2254 habeas petition. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 5/31/2019. (CKM)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner DONALD MALLARD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Certificate of Prisoner Account)(REO) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by DONALD MALLARD. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - State Court documents)(REO) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by DONALD MALLARD located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by DONALD MALLARD to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MALLARD v. ZATECHY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DONALD MALLARD | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECHY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
