JEAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INC.
| SERAPHIN JEAN |
| INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INC. |
| 1:2019cv02005 |
| May 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Indiana Attorney General, c/o Curtis Hill. (DWH) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INC. (DWH) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INC.. (Boyd, Amber) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INC.. (Boyd, Amber) |
| Filing 5 TRIAL PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge James Patrick Hanlon. (DWH) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INC.. (HET) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Amber K. Boyd on behalf of Plaintiff SERAPHIN JEAN. (Boyd, Amber) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, filed by SERAPHIN JEAN. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5440026) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boyd, Amber) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
