GARNER v. SMITH
| NICHOLIS COREY GARNER |
| BRADLEY SMITH |
| 1:2019cv02072 |
| May 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan Findley on behalf of Defendant BRADLEY SMITH. (Findley, Bryan) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by NICHOLIS COREY GARNER . BRADLEY SMITH waiver sent on 5/29/2019. (Cochran, Kelly) Modified on 6/27/2019 - Edited filed by to Plaintiff(NAD). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly Cochran on behalf of Defendant BRADLEY SMITH. (Cochran, Kelly) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk to Bradley Smith (Indiana State Police) (NAD) |
Filing 4
ENTRY - GRANTING #2 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, DISCUSSING ACTION, AND DIRECTING SERVICE. While in forma pauperis status allows a plaintiff to proceed without pre-payment of the filing fee, the plaintiff remains liable for the full fees. The filing fee for in forma pauperis litigants is $350.00. No payment is due currently; however, the $350.00 balance remains owing. The Court has not determined that the action must be dismissed pursuant to 1915(e) and therefore the matter shall proceed. This ruling is without prejudice to the filing of a proper Rule 12 motion. Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) requires the Court to order service for Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Clerk is designated pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3) to issue process to Defendant Bradley Smith in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the Complaint ( Filing No. #1 ), applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. (See Entry.) Copies via US Mail per distribution list. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/29/2019. (NAD)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff NICHOLIS COREY GARNER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Inmate Inquiry, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Envelope)(REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRADLEY SMITH, filed by NICHOLIS COREY GARNER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GARNER v. SMITH | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NICHOLIS COREY GARNER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BRADLEY SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Bryan Findley |
| Represented By: | Kelly Cochran |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
