MCMASTERS v. SAUL
| JULIE B. MCMASTERS |
| NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL |
| 1:2019cv02239 |
| June 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Richard L Young |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by ANDREW M. SAUL. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Wierenga, Julian) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/6/2019. (JRB)
|
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph R. Wambach on behalf of Plaintiff JULIE B. MCMASTERS. (Wambach, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Frederick Richter on behalf of Plaintiff JULIE B. MCMASTERS. (Richter, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff JULIE B. MCMASTERS. (Richter, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL, filed by JULIE B. MCMASTERS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Richter, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
