NEEL v. VOGUE INC.
| ASHLEY NEEL |
| VOGUE INC and VOGUE INC. |
| 1:2019cv02325 |
| June 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by VOGUE INC.. (Taylor, Christopher) |
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER-TELEPHONIC Initial Pretrial Conference set for 9/6/2019 at 2:30 PM (Eastern) before Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 7/16/2019.(CBU)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE to File Corporate Disclosure Statement to VOGUE INC. (LAB) (NAD) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by VOGUE INC..(Taylor, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher R. Taylor on behalf of Defendant VOGUE INC.. (Taylor, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to VOGUE INC. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Amber K. Boyd on behalf of Plaintiff ASHLEY NEEL. (Boyd, Amber) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against VOGUE INC, filed by ASHLEY NEEL. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5472228) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boyd, Amber) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
