BALDWIN v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
| BRADLEY BALDWIN |
| WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (IDOC), WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 1:2019cv02344 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| James R Sweeney |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S AGREED UPON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO STATE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS - Plaintiff Bradley Baldwin, by counsel, having filed his Agreed Upon Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, and the Court being duly advised in the premises, hereby grants Plaintiff's Motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss either by the filing of a responsive brief or an amended complaint is extended up to and including August 14, 2019. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 7/30/2019. (JDC)
|
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #2 Complaint , Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses, filed by WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC.(Bitner, Douglass) |
| Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC identifying Corporate Parent THE BANTRY GROUP for WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC.. (Bitner, Douglass) |
| Filing 13 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to August 14, 2019 re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Plaintiff BRADLEY BALDWIN. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mulligan, Edward) |
| Filing 12 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendants INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. (Gore, Lyubov) |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendants INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. (Gore, Lyubov) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Lyubov Gore on behalf of Defendants INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. (Gore, Lyubov) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Paul Nagy on behalf of Defendants INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. (Nagy, Jonathan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, re #2 Complaint. (Bitner, Douglass) Modified on 7/9/2019 (JDC). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Douglass R. Bitner on behalf of Defendant WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC. (Bitner, Douglass) |
| Filing 6 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC. (REO) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory L. Laker on behalf of Plaintiff BRADLEY BALDWIN. (Laker, Gregory) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT for Damages and Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by BRADLEY BALDWIN. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5475311) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Tort Claim Notice, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Mulligan, Edward) Modified on 6/13/2019 (REO). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward B. Mulligan, V on behalf of Plaintiff BRADLEY BALDWIN. (Mulligan, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
